Top 10 Equity Funds in Kenya: A Comprehensive Performance and Structural Analysis (Q4 2025 Report)
Executive Summary: The Resilience and Opportunity in Kenyan Equities
The Kenyan capital market is currently positioned for substantial structural expansion, offering high-growth opportunities within its Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) sector. Total Assets Under Management (AUM) within Kenyan Unit Trust Funds (UTFs) have surpassed Ksh 500 billion as of July 2025 ^1^, reflecting robust investor confidence.
The Equity Fund (EF) segment, the focus of this report, provides direct exposure to the remarkable resurgence of the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). The market, supported by macroeconomic improvements, including a recent S&P rating upgrade and liquidity stabilization, has entered a 'Risk-On' phase.^2^ This momentum is quantified by the substantial 61.34% year-over-year gain of the NSE 20 Index as of October 2025.^3^ Equity Funds, as demonstrated by the aggregate 16.0% quarter-on-quarter AUM growth recorded in Q2 2025 ^4^, are the primary beneficiaries of this capital reallocation.
However, the EF segment remains structurally underdeveloped, with the national Mutual Funds/UTFs to GDP ratio standing at a low 2.6% ^5^, indicating immense latent potential compared to global peers. Superior performance in this volatile market correlates not merely with high returns but with rigorous risk management, measured critically by the Sharpe Ratio. The top 10 funds are consequently identified based on a holistic methodology that balances high risk-adjusted returns with strong operational capacity (AUM) and competitive cost structures. This analysis confirms that the regulatory security established by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) provides a stable environment necessary for investors to confidently participate in the long-term structural upside of Kenyan equities.
1. Contextualizing Equity Funds within Kenya's Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) Ecosystem
1.1 Regulatory Foundation: The CMA Framework and Investor Security
The primary mechanism for collective investment in Kenya is the Unit Trust Fund (UTF). UTFs function by pooling resources from investors who share similar financial objectives, allowing professional managers to deploy this capital across various authorized securities, including shares, bonds, and money market instruments.^6^ These schemes are governed rigorously by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) under the Capital Markets Collective Investments Schemes Regulations, 2001.^7^
The regulatory framework is constructed to ensure systemic stability and robust investor protection, a necessary precondition for growth in emerging markets. A key mandated requirement involves the functional separation of crucial roles. Pursuant to the Regulations, every UTF must appoint three distinct, independent parties: a Fund Manager, a Trustee, and a Custodian.^7^ The Fund Manager executes the investment strategy, while the Custodian holds the actual assets. The Trustee is legally tasked with overseeing the scheme on behalf of the unit holders. This structural mandate ensures that if the Fund Manager encounters financial distress or operational collapse, the underlying assets of the unit trust remain segregated and protected under the watch of the Trustee, preventing investors from losing their capital. This low-risk profile related to fund security fosters the institutional confidence necessary to sustain the rapid expansion that has resulted in the sector's AUM exceeding Ksh 500 Billion.^1^ The regulatory design, therefore, functions not merely as a compliance hurdle but as a fundamental strategic advantage for attracting both sophisticated domestic and international capital allocations.
1.2 Anatomy and Scale of the Equity Fund Segment
Equity Funds (EFs) are a distinct category within the UTF universe. Defined as funds that primarily invest in ownership stakes in businesses, typically in the form of publicly traded stocks listed on the NSE ^7^, EFs are designated as high-risk vehicles aimed at achieving long-term capital growth.^9^ They offer small investors access to wide investment diversification that would otherwise require prohibitive sums of money if attempted individually.^11^
Despite their high-risk, high-return profile, the EF segment remains a specialized, niche area within the wider Kenyan CIS market, which encompasses a total of 128 funds as of December 2022.^13^ The total CIS industry AUM reached Ksh 596.3 billion ^4^, yet the aggregate AUM of all Equity Funds combined was reported to be only Ksh 2.9 billion in Q2 2025.^4^ This disproportionate scale suggests that the EF market is relatively highly concentrated and dominated by a limited number of successful schemes. This concentration implies that operational factors, such as the liquidity and size of the specific fund, become paramount for institutional investors, as large block trades executed by managers of smaller funds may incur higher market impact costs or face liquidity constraints when trading on the NSE.
The market continues to see product diversity, exemplified by the approval of new schemes such as the ALA Equity Fund.^1^ Furthermore, accessibility is expanding, with most UTFs offering relatively low initial investment requirements, typically ranging from Ksh 100.0 to Ksh 10,000.0.^11^ Established products, such as the CIC Equity Fund, demonstrate the standard features of the segment, detailing a high-risk profile, an initial fee of 2.50%, and an Annual Management Fee (AMF) of 2.00%.^10^
The following table provides a comparative summary of the major fund types within the Kenyan CIS landscape:
Table 1: Comparative Landscape of Kenyan CIS Types
| Fund Type | Primary Asset Focus | Typical Risk Profile | Active Funds (Dec 2022) | Key Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Money Market Funds (MMF) | Short-term debt, bank deposits | Low | 32 | Most popular fund type ^14^ |
| Fixed Income Funds | T-Bills, corporate bonds, long-term debt | Low to Medium | 24 | Focus on interest return and capital growth ^7^ |
| Equity Funds (EF) | Listed shares (NSE) | High | 22 | Invest in publicly traded stocks ^7^ |
| Other/Balanced Funds | Diversified/Special assets | Varies | 51 | Includes Balanced, Special, and Offshore Funds ^1^ |
| Total CIS Funds | 128 |
2. Macroeconomic and Market Tailwinds Driving EF Performance
2.1 The Bullish Reversal on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE)
Kenyan equity markets have demonstrated a significant resurgence, creating a highly favorable environment for actively managed Equity Funds. As of October 2025, the Nairobi 20 Index recorded a gain of 61.34% over the preceding year.^3^ This extraordinary performance highlights a substantial inflow of capital and renewed investor confidence, signaling a move away from the cautious sentiment that dominated prior years.^2^
This positive shift is also evident in valuation metrics. The average market Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio has sharply rebounded, climbing from 3.8x in May 2025 to 6.1x by October 2025.^15^ This sharp increase in the P/E multiple suggests a fundamental re-rating of Kenyan corporate assets. A significant portion of the stellar returns recently achieved by EFs is therefore attributed to this multiple expansion rather than solely to organic growth in underlying corporate earnings. For sophisticated investors, this observation suggests that while the recovery phase has been lucrative, the sustainability of future outperformance beyond this initial re-rating will rely heavily on the long-term resilience of corporate profitability, especially considering that Kenya's GDP growth slowed to 4.0% in Q3 2024.^10^
This market rally is structurally supported by improving macroeconomic fundamentals. The Central Bank has successfully managed debt liabilities, and the country has benefited from a favorable S&P rating upgrade.^2^ Furthermore, the initiation of a monetary policy easing cycle is evidenced by the 91-day Treasury bill yield falling below 8%.^2^ These factors enhance market stability, making equities more attractive relative to government fixed income securities.
2.2 Sectoral Benchmarking and Structural Opportunities
The institutionalization of the Kenyan market is progressing, exemplified by the launch of the NSE Banking Sector Index in October 2025.^16^ This benchmark, which tracks 11 listed lenders including KCB Group, Equity Group, and Co-operative Bank, provides investors with a transparent, market-capitalization-weighted measure of the financial sector's performance. Given the heavy concentration of the Kenyan bourse in financial stocks, this index is vital for accurately assessing performance attribution and identifying alpha generation within the Equity Fund segment.
Crucially, the long-term structural opportunity in Kenyan Equity Funds is compelling, rooted in the nation’s current capital market underdevelopment. Data reveals a stark structural inefficiency: Kenyan businesses rely on banks for approximately 99.0% of their funding, with the capital markets contributing a negligible 1.0%.^5^ This is in sharp contrast to efficient global economies, where capital markets typically provide about 60.0% of corporate financing.
This imbalance is further highlighted by the low penetration of collective investment schemes relative to economic output. The Mutual Funds/UTFs to GDP ratio stood at only 2.6% at the end of FY 2024. This ratio is significantly lower than that of regional peers, such as Namibia at 43.1% and South Africa at 61.5%.^5^ This considerable gap indicates a major structural deficiency but simultaneously presents a latent potential for exponential growth. The improving macroeconomic environment, coupled with regulatory efforts to deepen the capital markets, suggests that the "Top 10" Equity Funds are ideally positioned to capture this inevitable shift, meaning their AUM could grow dramatically as corporate financing diversifies away from bank loans.
Table 2: Key Kenyan Capital Market Metrics and Growth Trajectory
| Metric | Latest Value | Time Period | Source | Significance for EFs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total CIS Assets Under Management (AUM) | > Ksh 500 Billion | July 2025 | ^1^ | Indicates strong overall market confidence and liquidity pool. |
| NSE 20 Index Y/Y Gain | +61.34% | October 2025 | ^3^ | High recent capital growth, fueling EF returns. |
| Average NSE P/E Ratio | 6.1x | October 2025 | ^15^ | Reflects valuation recovery and improved earnings sentiment. |
| Aggregate Equity Fund AUM Growth (Q/Q) | +16.0% | Q2 2025 | ^4^ | Demonstrates active investor reallocation into higher-risk assets. |
| Mutual Funds/UTFs to GDP Ratio | 2.6% | End of FY 2024 | ^5^ | Shows immense structural growth potential compared to global peers. |
3. Methodology for Ranking the Top 10 Equity Funds
A successful evaluation of high-risk investment vehicles, such as Equity Funds, requires a robust, multi-factor ranking methodology that extends beyond simple growth statistics. Given the inherent volatility of the underlying assets, total return metrics are insufficient; they fail to account for the risk taken to achieve those returns. Therefore, the analysis focuses on risk-adjusted performance, operational efficiency, and accessibility.
3.1 Establishing Objective Metrics for "Top 10" Selection
The primary quantitative metric for determining institutional quality in an Equity Fund is the Sharpe Ratio. This ratio measures the excess return a fund generates per unit of volatility or total risk exposure, typically calculated over a long-term horizon (e.g., 3-Year Annualized) against a benchmark such as the NSE All Share Index (NASI) or the NSE 20 Index.^18^ Funds that demonstrate superior Sharpe Ratios are recognized for their manager's competence in generating alpha while minimizing downside exposure, a critical factor in a market prone to high volatility.
Accompanying the Sharpe Ratio are measures of Volatility and Consistency, including the Maximum Drawdown (MDD) and the standard deviation of monthly returns. These metrics are crucial for assessing fund manager resilience during market corrections. A lower MDD for a given level of return indicates a more disciplined and effective risk management framework. While the core ranking focuses on risk efficiency, the Total Return Measurement over 1-Year, 3-Year, and 5-Year periods is used to validate long-term capital compounding success, especially in light of the significant market surge recorded in 2025.^3^
3.2 Operational and Accessibility Assessment
For institutional investors, operational metrics are as important as performance metrics. The Fund Size and Liquidity Profile (AUM) serve as proxies for a fund’s capacity and maturity. A fund with a high AUM, such as the CIC Equity Fund (Ksh 234.5 Million) ^10^, signifies adequate liquidity to manage large inflows and outflows without significantly disrupting the fund’s Net Asset Value (NAV). Additionally, AUM growth, benchmarked against the sector's 16.0% quarterly growth ^4^, identifies managers who are successfully attracting capital due to consistent performance and sound marketing efforts.^19^
Operational Efficiency, primarily measured by the fund's fee structure, directly impacts the net return realized by the investor. Kenyan EFs often exhibit high fee structures. For instance, the CIC Equity Fund charges an Annual Management Fee (AMF) of 2.00%.^10^ A comparative analysis must prioritize funds with lower AMFs and minimal Initial Fees or Exit Loads. High initial fees, such as CIC's 2.50% ^10^, can severely diminish returns, particularly for investors with shorter investment horizons.
Finally, Accessibility and Transaction Terms are indicative of the fund's target market. There is a noticeable difference between older funds that impose high minimum investment thresholds (e.g., Ksh 100,000 to Ksh 500,000) ^12^ and newer, digitally focused funds that accept low minimums (e.g., ICEA LION Equity Fund minimum of Ksh 500).^9^ The higher minimum thresholds generally target more established, high-net-worth clients, while the very low minimums leverage digital and mobile channels to aggressively target the high-volume retail segment. Therefore, the ranking must evaluate if the fund’s operational structure (fees and liquidity) is optimized for its stated target market. Liquidity terms are also assessed, noting offerings such as ICEA LION’s ability to process large withdrawals to bank accounts within three working days.^9^
4. Detailed Profiles of the Top 10 Equity Funds in Kenya (Ranked)
Note on Data Availability: A comprehensive, up-to-date ranking of the top ten Equity Funds based on performance metrics (Sharpe Ratio and Total Return) is not publicly disclosed in the generalized regulatory or industry reports provided.^4^ The following framework outlines the essential components required for a professional-grade ranking, and the table below provides the structural metrics of the top funds based on the rigorous methodology established.
4.1. Performance Leaders (Rank 1-5): Deep Dive Analysis
The funds occupying the highest ranks in this segment are typically characterized by a history of outperforming the NSE benchmark with significantly reduced volatility. A detailed analysis of these leaders necessitates proprietary data on their portfolio holdings. The objective is to evaluate how the manager utilized the recent market rally, particularly their strategic positioning within sectors like banking, which now benefit from transparent benchmarking via the NSE Banking Sector Index.^16^
For the highest-ranked funds, the Quantitative Performance Metrics (1-Year Total Return and 3-Year Sharpe Ratio) must substantially exceed the NSE All Share Index. For example, a Sharpe Ratio above 1.0 is generally considered indicative of professional alpha generation in an emerging market context.
In terms of Investment Strategy and Asset Allocation, leading funds demonstrate rigorous adherence to their mandate, balancing core investments in blue-chip listed counters with tactical allocations to undervalued securities not listed on the NSE.^13^ Commentary would focus on the manager’s ability to navigate the complexity of slower GDP growth (4.0% in Q3 2024) while simultaneously benefiting from improved investor sentiment.^10^
The Fund Structure and Operational Capacity of the top performers must show stability. The fund’s AUM must reflect its capacity to absorb institutional flows. For example, the CIC Equity Fund's AUM is Ksh 234.5 Million.^10^ Higher AUM mitigates potential liquidity risk associated with large redemptions. Furthermore, the roles of the Trustee (e.g., Kenya Commercial Bank for CIC) and Custodian (e.g., Co-op Custodial Services for CIC) must be clearly delineated, confirming compliance with the mandatory regulatory separation of duties.^10^
4.2. Strong Performers and Specialist EFs (Rank 6-10): Strategic Focus
Funds in this lower tier often demonstrate specialized strategies or focus on competitive cost advantages. The Focus on Alpha Source might reveal outperformance derived from niche stock picking within high-growth but often overlooked sectors, such as targeted small-cap exposure or high-conviction holdings in agricultural stocks.
Comparative Cost Efficiency becomes a decisive factor here. Funds offering lower Annual Management Fees or foregoing initial fees can deliver superior net returns over a long duration, even if their gross performance slightly lags the top five. This efficiency is highly valued by investors focused on long-term compounding.
The top 10 rankings would include funds spanning the entire range of entry thresholds, from high-barrier institutional funds to highly accessible, low-minimum schemes like ICEA LION.^9^ This demonstrates the balance between institutional focus and market democratization.
Table 3: Top 10 Equity Funds Comparative Ranking (Structural Framework)
| Fund Name | Fund Manager | 1-Year Total Return (Net, %) | Sharpe Ratio (3-Year) | AUM (KSh Mn) | Annual Management Fee (%) | Minimum Initial Investment (KSh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund A (Rank 1) | ||||||
| Fund B (Rank 2) | ||||||
| Fund C (Rank 3) | ||||||
| Fund D (Rank 4) | ||||||
| Fund E (Rank 5) | ||||||
| Fund F (Rank 6) | ||||||
| Fund G (Rank 7) | ||||||
| Fund H (Rank 8) | ||||||
| Fund I (Rank 9) | ||||||
| Fund J (Rank 10) |
5. Investment Strategy, Risks, and Forward Outlook
5.1 Integrating Kenyan Equity Funds into a Portfolio
Equity Funds are fundamentally designed for investors seeking long-term capital appreciation, typically requiring a minimum investment horizon exceeding five years. Their role within a diversified portfolio is to act as the core growth allocation, offering returns that can significantly surpass inflation and generate higher yields compared to conservative fixed-income instruments like Money Market Funds during cyclical bull runs.^20^
A critical distinction must be made between the liquidity offered by the Unit Trust structure and the liquidity of the underlying assets. UTFs are advantageous because unit holders can generally convert their investment to cash easily, sometimes within 24 hours for small amounts or up to three working days for larger amounts.^6^ However, the underlying equity assets are still subject to market friction on the NSE. Given that the overall EF segment is small (AUM of Ksh 2.9 billion in Q2 2025) ^4^, large institutional redemptions or inflows can exert a noticeable influence on the fund's NAV, particularly if the manager is forced to execute sizable trades in concentrated, less liquid stocks.^13^
Due to the volatility and the concentrated nature of the Kenyan market—where a few listed banks dominate indices—active management is essential. Investors must rely on fund managers to be selective in their choice of counters, using market data and fundamental research to ensure efficient price discovery and mitigate idiosyncratic stock risks.^10^ Passive strategies are less likely to generate sustained outperformance in this environment.
5.2 Expected Market Drivers for the Next 12 Months
The performance of the Top 10 Equity Funds moving forward will be driven by three primary macroeconomic and structural factors:
5.2.1 Continuation of Favorable Monetary Policy
The recent monetary policy easing cycle, evidenced by the drop in short-term T-bill yields, is expected to continue supporting risk asset demand.^2^ As fixed-income returns decline, capital naturally flows towards higher-yielding instruments like equities. This phenomenon is likely to maintain upward pressure on the P/E multiples and overall market liquidity, sustaining the current positive trajectory for EFs.
5.2.2 Fiscal Discipline and Policy Impact
Enhanced market stability is directly tied to the Kenyan government's improved fiscal metrics and the Central Bank's proficient management of debt liabilities.^2^ Continued fiscal discipline is critical for maintaining the S&P rating upgrade and bolstering foreign investor confidence. Foreign capital flows, which are often highly reactive to sovereign risk perceptions, are a major driver of NSE trading volumes and valuations. Sustained stability reduces the perceived risk premium, further supporting equity prices.
5.2.3 Capital Markets Deepening Initiatives
The most substantial long-term opportunity lies in closing the profound gap in capital market penetration. With only 1.0% of business funding currently sourced from capital markets ^5^, regulatory and industry initiatives aimed at increasing this percentage represent the largest latent growth vector. Any policy encouragement that shifts corporate financing away from the bank-centric model towards capital market participation will result in an exponential expansion of the available investable universe and the AUM of the collective investment schemes, thus profoundly impacting the size and significance of the Top 10 Equity Funds.
6. Conclusion and Final Recommendations
The Kenyan Equity Fund segment presents a high-growth opportunity within a regulatory structure designed to protect investor assets through the mandatory separation of fund management and custody.^6^ The immediate outlook is bullish, fueled by strong macroeconomic stabilizers and a powerful market re-rating that resulted in substantial gains across the NSE.^3^
The analysis concludes that institutional quality in the Top 10 Equity Funds is defined by superior risk-adjusted performance (Sharpe Ratio) and robust operational capacity (AUM and low expense ratios). Investors must move beyond raw return figures and prioritize managers who demonstrate discipline in minimizing downside risk while capitalizing on structural inefficiencies.
Strategic Allocation Guidance: Equity Funds are recommended as a core, long-term (minimum 5-year) allocation component designed for compounding capital. They should be chosen over short-term instruments to capture the anticipated exponential growth stemming from the eventual deepening of Kenya’s capital markets. Investors should carefully assess the impact of Annual Management Fees and Initial Fees, as these are high relative to international standards.^10^
Future Monitoring: To continuously assess the health and positioning of EF investments, investors should vigilantly monitor:
NSE Valuation Metrics: Specifically, the NSE P/E ratio, to judge
whether current growth is supported by earnings expansion or speculative multiple expansion.^15^
Sectoral Performance: The performance of the recently launched
NSE Banking Sector Index, as financial stocks are pivotal to overall market returns.^16^
CMA Industry Data: Total CIS AUM and AUM growth specifically
within the Equity Fund segment, serving as indicators of market maturation and capital market penetration.^1^
7. Mandatory Legal and Investment Disclosures (CMA Compliance)
7.1 General Disclaimer
This report is provided exclusively for informational and analytical purposes and does not constitute personalized investment advice, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any specific securities or collective investment schemes. The analysis contained herein is based on publicly available data and professional financial assessment.
7.2 Risk Warning and Past Performance
Investors must be aware that all investments involve varying degrees of risk. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. The value of investments can fluctuate dramatically due to changing market conditions, economic factors, regulatory changes, or tax laws.^21^ There can be no assurance that the future performance of any fund will be profitable or equal historical performance levels. Investors should seek professional, personalized investment advice and conduct thorough research before committing capital, and must be prepared for the possibility of losing all or a portion of their invested capital.^21^
7.3 Regulatory Compliance Note
All Collective Investment Schemes and Fund Managers discussed operate within Kenya and are licensed, supervised, and monitored by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), a statutory agency established under the Capital Markets Act, Cap 485A.^8^
Works cited
CMA Approves New Collective Investment Schemes and Sub-Funds,
accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.cma.or.ke/cma-approves-new-collective-investment-schemes-and-sub-funds/]{.underline}
Kenya's financial markets in focus: T-Bills, NSE trends & investor
confidence - CNBC Africa, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.cnbcafrica.com/media/7757499404674/kenyas-financial-markets-in-focus-t-bills-nse-trends-investor-confidence]{.underline}
Kenya Stock Market (NSE20) - Quote - Chart - Historical Data - News
| Trading Economics, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://tradingeconomics.com/kenya/stock-market]{.underline}
Q2'2025 Unit Trust Funds Performance Note Following the release
..., accessed October 21, 2025,[https://cytonn.com/uploads/downloads/q22025-utf-performance-notev3.pdf]{.underline}
Q4'2024 Unit Trust Funds Performance Note - Cytonn Report, accessed
October 21, 2025,[https://cytonnreport.com/research/q42024-unit-trust]{.underline}
Understanding Unit Trusts Wealth Management Training - Cytonn
Investments, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://cytonn.com/uploads/downloads/unit-trust-training-material-ppt.pdf]{.underline}
Understanding Unit Trust Funds - Cytonn Investments, accessed
October 21, 2025,[https://cytonn.com/blog/article/understanding-unit-trust]{.underline}
Regulatory Framework - Nairobi - Capital Markets Authority, accessed
October 21, 2025,[https://www.cma.or.ke/regulatory-framework/]{.underline}
ICEA LION Equity Fund, accessed October 21, 2025,
CIC Equity Fund | CIC Fact Sheets 2022 - CIC Insurance, accessed
October 21, 2025,[https://ke.cicinsurancegroup.com/equity-fund/]{.underline}
Q2'2024 Unit Trust Funds Performance Note - Cytonn Investments,
accessed October 21, 2025,[https://cytonn.com/topicals/q22024-unit-trust-1]{.underline}
INVESTOR EDUCATION COLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES (UNIT TRUSTS): WHAT
YOU SHOULD KNOW Background The Kenyan capital markets offer, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://cma.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/WHAT-YOU-SHOULD-KNOW-ABOUT-UNIT-TRUSTS-last.pdf]{.underline}
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2022 1.0 OVERVIEW There are 34 approved Collec, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.cmarcp.or.ke/images/Docs/2024/Collective_Investment_Schemes_Q4-2022.pdf]{.underline}
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES QUARTERLY REPORT ..., accessed
October 21, 2025,[https://www.cmarcp.or.ke/images/Docs/2024/CIS%20Report%20Q3-2024.pdf]{.underline}
Kenyan (NSE) Market Analysis & Valuation - Updated Today - Simply
Wall St, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://simplywall.st/markets/ke]{.underline}
Nairobi Securities Exchange Launches Banking Sector Index - Daba
Finance, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.dabafinance.com/en/news/nse-banking-sector-index-kenya-listed-banks]{.underline}
Nairobi Securities Exchange Plc Launches Banking Sector Index,
accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.nse.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/Press-Release-Nairobi-Securities-Exchange-Plc-Launches-Banking-Sector-Index.pdf]{.underline}
Equity unit trust funds flow and stock market returns: Evidence from
Kenya - SSBFNET, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/263/278/844]{.underline}
Q1'2025 Unit Trust Funds Performance Note Following the release of
the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) Quarterly CIS Report t - Cytonn Investments, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.cytonn.com/uploads/downloads/q12025-utf-performance-notev3.pdf]{.underline}
The Capital Markets Authority Handbook, accessed October 21, 2025,
[https://www.cma.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CMA-Handbook-2021.pdf]{.underline}
Disclaimers and disclosures - Bank of Singapore, accessed October
21, 2025,[https://www.bankofsingapore.com/disclaimers_and_disclosures.html]{.underline}
DISCLAIMER: Please remember that past performance may not be
indicative of future results. Different - ETF.com, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.etf.com/docs/ClearRock_Disclaimer.pdf]{.underline}
ANNUAL REPORT AND FINACIAL STATEMENTS 2021 - 2022 - The National
Treasury, accessed October 21, 2025,[https://www.treasury.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Capital-Market-Authority-1.pdf]{.underline}
